vsc.five-star.com
February 10, 2012, 04:19:58 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Just added new superheroe avatars. Also, fixed the quick reply section and added a few other things here and there to clean things up a bit.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: H.B. 4520 / The Tanning Bed Cancer Control Act of 2010  (Read 256 times)
IVR
phpBB IVR Guru
*****
Posts: 486



View Profile
« on: January 28, 2010, 08:11:56 AM »

If you are part of the tanning industry and not a member of The ITA now is the time to join. The tanning industry is under attack from all directions and The ITA needs everyones help to fight the battles at the local, state and federal levels. www.theita.com

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[H.R. 4520 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4520

  To help prevent the occurrence of cancer resulting from the use of
 ultraviolet tanning lamps by imposing more stringent controls on the
              use of such devices, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2010

  Mrs. Maloney (for herself, Mr. Dent, Mr. Grijalva, and Mr. Brady of
Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To help prevent the occurrence of cancer resulting from the use of
 ultraviolet tanning lamps by imposing more stringent controls on the
              use of such devices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tanning Bed Cancer Control Act of
2010''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds as follows:
            (1) One million Americans--70 percent of whom are girls and
        women--visit a tanning salon each day.
            (2) In July 2009, the World Health Organization
        International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working
        Group raised the classification of the use of UV-emitting
        tanning devices to Group 1, ``carcinogenic to humans.''
            (3) The new carcinogen classification places tanning beds
        alongside tobacco smoke, asbestos, and uranium as known cancer-
        causing agents.
            (4) The World Health Organization reports that the risk of
        cutaneous melanoma is increased by 75 percent when use of
        tanning devices starts before 30 years of age.
            (5) According to the American Academy of Dermatology, there
        were over 120,000 new melanomas diagnosed in the United States
        during 2009 and approximately 8,650 people were estimated to
        die from melanoma during 2009.
            (6) In a December 2008 Report to Congress, FDA determined,
        through its own analysis, that the current warning labels for
        indoor tanning devices do not effectively communicate the risks
        associated with indoor tanning and is therefore reviewing
        modifications to the labeling requirements in an effort to
        better inform consumers about the risks associated with sunlamp
        products.
            (7) According to section 514 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
        Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360d), the Secretary of Health and
        Human Services determines performance standards are established
        by providing that a drug or device allows for the reasonable
        assurance of safe and effective performance.
            (Cool If tanning devices do not provide reasonable assurances
        of safe and effective performance, the Secretary shall seek to
        reclassify these devices as is most appropriate based on the
        scientific evidence and to put in place safeguards for consumer
        access to these devices.

SEC. 3. RECLASSIFICATION.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (hereinafter in this Act
referred to as the ``Commissioner'') shall complete a study to examine
the classification of ultraviolet tanning lamps as class I devices.
    (b) Reclassification.--Not later than 1 year after the completion
of the study under subsection (a), the Commissioner shall, based on the
results of such study--
            (1) issue a rule providing for the reclassification under
        section 513(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
        U.S.C. 260c(e)) of an ultraviolet tanning lamp as a class II or
        class III device; or
            (2) submit to the Congress a report that provides a
        justification for not issuing such a rule.

SEC. 4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Commissioner shall complete a study on performance
standards established under section 514 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360d) for ultraviolet tanning lamps to examine
the adequacy of such performance standards.
    (b) Revision of Performance Standards.--Except as provided in
subsection (c), the Commissioner, based on the results of the study
under subsection (a), shall, not later than 1 year after the completion
of such study--
            (1) issue a rule providing for more stringent performance
        standards for ultraviolet tanning lamps, including with respect
        to the strength of ultraviolet rays emitted by such devices and
        the amount of time a user should remain exposed to such
        devices; or
            (2) submit to the Congress a report that provides a
        justification for not issuing such a rule.
    (c) Labeling Requirements.--The Commissioner shall carry out the
recommendations made in the report submitted under section 230 of the
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-85)
regarding the labeling of ultraviolet tanning lamps.

SEC. 5. NO LIMITATION ON RECALL AUTHORITY.

    Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit the authority of
the Commissioner under section 518(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360h(e)) with regard to an ultraviolet tanning
lamp.

SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) The term ``ultraviolet tanning lamp''--
                    (A) refers to an ultraviolet ray-emitting device
                for purposes of tanning, including indoor tanning
                devices and sunlamps for tanning; and
                    (B) notwithstanding subparagraph (A), does not
                include an ultraviolet ray-emitting device for purposes
                of use as part of a treatment regimen prescribed by a
                licensed health care professional.
            (2) The terms ``class I'', ``class II'', and ``class III''
        have the meanings given such terms in section 513(h) of the
        Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(h)).
            (3) The terms ``device'', ``interstate commerce'',
        ``label'', and ``labeling'' have the meanings given such terms
        under section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
        (21 U.S.C. 321).
                                 <all>

Report to moderator   Logged
IVR
phpBB IVR Guru
*****
Posts: 486



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2010, 08:41:14 AM »

The indoor tanning community - retail businesses, suppliers and the 30 million indoor tanning clients who value its service - must continue to make Congress aware that no form of a federal "Tan Tax" should be considered in or outside of the controversial health care bill.

Smart Tan on Friday released a three-sentence statement meant to convey that the 'Tan Tax" provision in the U.S. Senate's version of the health care bill apparently will not immediately move forward and that Sen. Ben Nelson has joined the list of legislators who have said they will work hard to keep the tan tax out of any future version of the bill.

"In sending out an advisory to our members with the headline "Tan Tax is Dead" we mistakenly gave the impression that the 'Tan Tax' was gone forever - which was not our intention," Smart Tan Vice President Joseph Levy said. "Just as the tax was inserted into the health care bill in an 11th hour deal, it's possible it could still be put back into the bill and we can't let our guard down and let that happen."

Smart Tan put the short statement out on Friday after Ashley Lynn's Tanning founder Bart Bonn set up a meeting with U.S. Sen. Ben Nelson where Nelson confirmed that the Health Care bill was essentially dead in its tracks and that he would work with the tanning community to ensure that the Tan Tax does not appear in any future version of the health care bill that may emerge. Bonn asked Smart Tan Chairman Matt Russell to attend that meeting.

"We put that release together very quickly on a Friday afternoon - I dictated it into a phone from the back seat of a car on my way to a tanning convention so that our members could share the good news going into the weekend.," Levy said. "Many people read it to construe that the war was over when what we meant to say is that we've won a battle, but that the war against the tan tax needs to continue."

Thousands of members of the indoor tanning community have worked too hard fighting the Tan Tax to let our guard down now. The ITA and its professional lobbyists have led the way. But other salon groups - like James Oliver (Beach Bum Tanning in New York) have also hired lobbying groups. Bonn set up meetings with his congressional delegation on his own. And many other salon groups have called or visited their federal representatives to explain why The Tan Tax was a bad idea. Smart Tan's small role in this process has been to provide everyone with information to help in their efforts.

ITA President Dan Humiston said in an email release this morning, "Tell everyone to double their efforts, tell everyone to email their friends, employees, customers, vendors and ask them to go to stopthetantax.com. Tell them to make an appointment with their Congressmen or Senator. Tell them to send postcards to their Congressmen."


Matt Russell, chairman

International Smart Tan Network
Report to moderator   Logged
IVR
phpBB IVR Guru
*****
Posts: 486



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2010, 08:46:00 AM »

This cost The ITA 4 million dollars but luckily the insurance company picked up the tab. The ITA did not have the funds to defend this.

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/01/tanning.shtm

For Release: 01/26/2010
Indoor Tanning Association Settles FTC Charges That It Deceived Consumers About Skin Cancer Risks From Tanning
The Federal Trade Commission today charged the Indoor Tanning Association with making false health and safety claims about indoor tanning. Contrary to claims in the association’s advertising, indoor tanning increases the risk of squamous cell and melanoma skin cancers, according to the FTC complaint. The association has agreed to a settlement that bars it from any further deception.

“The messages promoted by the indoor tanning industry fly in the face of scientific evidence,” said David C. Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “The industry needs to do a better job of communicating the risks of tanning to consumers.”

The Indoor Tanning Association represents tanning facilities and suppliers of tanning equipment. The FTC complaint alleges that in March 2008, the association launched an advertising campaign designed to portray indoor tanning as safe and beneficial. The campaign included two national newspaper ads, television and video advertising, two Web sites, a communications guide, and point-of-sale materials that were provided to association members for distribution in local markets. In addition to denying the skin cancer risks of tanning, the campaign allegedly also made these false claims:

Indoor tanning is approved by the government;
Indoor tanning is safer than tanning outdoors because the amount of ultraviolet light received when tanning indoors is monitored and controlled;
Research shows that vitamin D supplements may harm the body’s ability to fight disease; and
A National Academy of Sciences study determined that “the risks of not getting enough ultraviolet light far outweigh the hypothetical risk of skin cancer.”
The complaint also alleges that the association failed to disclose material facts in its advertising.

Under its settlement with the Commission, the association is prohibited from making the
misrepresentations challenged in the complaint, from misrepresenting any tests or studies, and from providing deceptive advertisements to members. The settlement also requires that future association ads that make safety or health benefits claims for indoor tanning may not be misleading and must be substantiated. Further, the order requires that certain future advertisements from the association contain disclosures. Ads that make claims about the safety or health benefits of indoor tanning are required to clearly and prominently make this disclosure:

“NOTICE: Exposure to ultraviolet radiation may increase the likelihood of developing skin cancer and can cause serious eye injury.”

Ads that claim exposure to ultraviolet radiation produces vitamin D in the body, or make other claims about the effectiveness or usefulness of indoor tanning products or services for the body’s generation of vitamin D, must clearly and prominently make this disclosure:

“NOTICE: You do not need to become tan for your skin to make vitamin D. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation may increase the likelihood of developing skin cancer and can cause serious eye injury.”

For more information about how indoor or outdoor tanning increases the risk of melanoma and other types of skin cancer, read the FTC Consumer Alert Indoor Tanning at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt174.pdf

The Commission vote to approve the administrative complaint and proposed consent agreement was 4-0. The FTC will publish an announcement regarding the agreement in the Federal Register shortly. The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through February 26, 2010, after which the Commission will decide whether to make it final. To file a public comment, please click on the following hyperlink: https://public.commentworks.com/ftc/indoortanningassoc and follow the instructions at that site.

Copies of the complaint, the proposed consent agreement, and an analysis of the
agreement to aid in public comment are available from both the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. A consent agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission of a law violation. When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of up to $16,000.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Betsy Lordan
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-3707
STAFF CONTACT:
Janet Evans
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-2125
(FTC File No. 0823159)
(Indoor Tanning.wpd)
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!